The primary objectives of the study are:
This trial is currently open and accepting patients.
The following criteria is a partial list of reasons why patients may be eligible to participate in this clinical trial. Further evaluation with a medical professional is required.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Note: Other protocol defined inclusion / exclusion criteria apply
Phase 1/2
Enrollment: 309 patients (estimated)
View MoreDecember 11, 2023
Results: As of February 28, 2023, 117 MM pts enrolled into the 200 mg cohort; median age was 70 (range: 37–91) with 26% ≥75, 26% were non-white, 14% had extramedullary (excluding paramedullary) plasmacytomas ≥2 cm, 36% had a high-risk cytogenetics, 22% had bone marrow plasma cells ≥50%, and 74% were ≥triple-class refractory. Median duration of follow-up was 5.6 months (interquartile range [Q1–Q3]: 3.02–8.34) ORR was 71% with ≥complete response (CR) rate of 30%. Responses deepen over time: median time to ≥partial response (PR) was 0.95 months (Q1–Q3: 0.76–1.87); median time to ≥VGPR was 1.87 months (0.79–3.55); and median time to ≥CR was 5.32 months (3.71–7.69). Moreover, high ORR and high rates of ≥CR were observed in many subgroups of difficult-to-treat MM pts. Specifically, ORR and ≥CR rates were: 70% and 29% in pts with ≥triple-class refractory disease; 68% and 26% in pts ≥75 years old; 62% and 26% in pts with high cytogenetic risk; and 47% and 18% in pts with International Staging System stage III. High rates of overall response and ≥CR were also observed in patients with high tumor burden as determined by various measures including bone marrow plasmacytosis ≥50% (50% and 31%) and soluble BCMA at baseline ≥ 0.4mg/L (55% and 25%). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated median duration of response was not reached (NR) (95% confidence interval [CI] non-evaluable [NE], NE), and probability of response at 12 months was 79% (95% CI 63, 89). KM estimated median PFS was NR (95% CI NE, NE) and probability of PFS at 12 months was 66% (95% CI 52, 77).
TEAEs occurred in all patients with Grade [Gr] ≥3 in 79%. The most common TEAE was cytokine release syndrome (any grade: 45%, Gr3-4: 1%, Gr5: 0; tocilizumab was utilized to treat these symptoms in 16 [13.7%] pts). Other common TEAEs were cough (33%, 0, and 0), neutropenia (32%, 31%, and 0), diarrhea (32%, 2%, and 0), and fatigue (32%, 0, and 0). Rate of infections of any grade was 59.8% with ≥Gr3 in 36.8%. The most common infections were pneumonia (any grade 17.1%, ≥Gr3 13.7%), upper respiratory tract infection (12.0%, and 2.6%), and COVID-19 (12.0%, 5.1%). Opportunistic infections (any grade) were observed in 9 (7.7%) pts including 7 (6.0%) pts ≥Gr3. Twenty-six of 117 (22%) pts were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin.
Conclusions: Linvoseltamab 200 mg induced deep responses in patients with RRMM including those with high-risk myeloma and high tumor burden, and deepened responses over time while maintaining a generally manageable safety profile. More mature data with longer follow-up will be reported at the meeting.
June 13, 2022
The overall response rate (ORR) was 51% among all enrolled patients (n = 73). Among all responders, 86% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) or better and 43% achieved a complete response (CR) or better.
All-grade treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) occurred in 100% of patients (grade 3, 42%; grade 4, 33%).
Hematologic TEAEs occurring in at least 20% of patients included anemia (all grade, 32%; grade 3, 23%), lymphopenia (all grade, 23%; grade 3, 10%; grade 4, 10%), neutropenia (all grade, 23%; grade 3, 7%; grade 4, 15%), and thrombocytopenia (all grade, 21%; grade 3, 8%; grade 4, 5%).
Nonhematologic TEAEs occurring in at least 20% of patients included fatigue (all grade, 45%; grade 3, 3%), CRS (all grade, 38%), pyrexia (all grade, 36%; grade 3, 4%), nausea (all grade, 33%), dyspnea (all grade, 26%), diarrhea (all grade, 25%; grade 3, 3%), back pain (all grade, 25%; grade 3, 5%), vomiting (all grade, 25%), pneumonia (all grade, 23%, grade 3, 11%), chills (all grade, 22%; grade 3, 1%), cough (all grade 22%), and headache (all grade, 21%; grade 3, 3%).
Three patients (4%) experienced grade 2 immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS); notably, no grade 3 ICANS events were reported.
Five (7%) grade 5 AEs occurred due to sepsis (n = 3), COVID-19 (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1); all deaths were determined to be unrelated to study treatment.
Across the study population, 38% of patients developed CRS. Most CRS events were grade 1 (n = 25), and only 3 patients (4%) experienced grade 2 CRS; no grade 3 or greater CRS events occurred.
January 28, 2022
As of January 28, 2022, 167 patients with RRMM across Phase 1 and 2 have received at least one dose of REGN5458. Median age was 64 (range 41-90), 49% of patients were male, patients had a median of 6 prior lines of therapy, and 90% were at least triple class refractory (refractory to a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 therapy); prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents was excluded (except BCMA antibody-drug conjugates). High-risk cytogenetic features were present in 13.6% of patients while 18.6% were stage 3 per revised International Staging System (R-ISS); 40% had bone marrow plasmacytosis >50%.
Across both phases, 164 (98.2%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for whom 78.4% were Grade (G) 3 or higher TEAEs. The most common hematologic TEAEs were anemia 36.5% (≥G3 29.9%), neutropenia 28.7% (27.5%) and thrombocytopenia 21% (16.2%). The most common non hematologic TEAEs reported (≥ 30%) were CRS 47.9% (G1 36.5%, G2 10.8%, and one patient with G3 0.6% [observed in the context of infection]) and fatigue 34.1%. Five patients (3%) discontinued REGN5458 due to treatment related adverse events (TRAEs), there were no treatment discontinuations due to CRS.
ORR was higher for phase 1 patients treated at ≥200 mg dose levels (N=24) as compared to that for patients treated at doses <200 mg (N=49), 75% versus 40.8%. This observation was consistent across patient subgroups by cytogenetic risk, R-ISS stage, prior therapy, and bone marrow plasmacytosis level. Responses deepened over time with 37.5% of patients with ≥CR. Median DOR has not been reached. Based on the overall benefit/risk profile, the RP2D was determined to be 200mg.
December 11, 2021
As of data cut-off (June 10, 2021), 68 pts were treated with REGN5458 in the dose escalation cohort with full doses ranging from 3–400 mg. The median age at enrollment was 64 years (range, 41‒81) and 20.6% pts were ≥75 years. As per Revised International Staging System, stage was 1, 2 or 3 in 14.7%, 60.3% and 23.5% of pts respectively. Pts had a median of 5 prior lines of systemic therapy (range, 2–17) with the majority of pts (51.5%) being penta-refractory (see Table). The median duration of follow-up was 2.4 months (range, 0.1–20.8).
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported in 66 pts (97.1%), and Grade (Gr) ≥3 TEAEs in 52 (76.5%) pts. The most frequent TEAEs were fatigue in 29 pts (42.6%), Gr 1/2 in 26 pts (38.2%), Gr 3 in 3 pts (4.4%); cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in 26 pts (38.2%), CRS was Gr 1 in 23 pts (33.8%) and Gr 2 in 3 pts (4.4%). No pt had Gr ≥3 CRS or discontinued treatment due to CRS. There were no Gr ≥3 neurotoxicity events. Nausea was reported in 22 pts (32.4%). The severity of nausea was Gr 1 in 23.5% of pts and Gr 2 in 8.8% of pts.
Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 56 patients (82.4%). The most frequent hematologic TRAE was neutropenia in 11 pts (16.2%), with Gr ≥3 severity in 9 of these pts (13.2%). The most frequent non-hematologic TRAEs were CRS (38.2%) and fatigue (20.6%). The safety profile was consistent across all dose levels, and there was no correlation between CRS and the full dose of REGN5458.
Responses were observed at all dose levels. Amongst pts treated at the 96 and 200 mg dose levels, the response rate was 73.3% (11/15). Across all dose levels, 92.6% (n=25) of all responders achieved at least a very good partial response and 48.1% (n=13) of responders had a complete response (CR) or stringent CR. Pts without extramedullary plasmacytomas (EMP) responded more frequently than those with EMP. The Kaplan–Meier estimated median DOR was not reached and the probability of DOR ≥8 months was 92.1% (95% confidence interval: 72.1, 98.0), with responses ongoing up to 19 months at the latest data cut-off.
Disease response was not impacted by level of BCMA expression in the core biopsy, as assessed by immunohistochemistry.
December 05, 2020
Results indicated that 95% (n = 18) of 19 patients who responded to treatment experienced a very good partial response (VGPR) or better and 42% achieved a complete response (CR) or a stringent CR (sCR).
At a median follow-up of 2.6 months, patients who received the agent at a dose of 3 mg, 6 mg, or 12 mg (n = 24; dosing levels [DL] 1-3) experienced an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.2%; 20.9% of these responders experienced a CR or sCR, while 4.2% had VGPR or better and 4.2% achieved a partial response (PR).
The ORR was higher among those who received REGN5458 at a dose of 24 mg or 48 mg (n = 17; DL 4-5), at 41.2%, with 11.8% of patients collectively experiencing a CR (11.8%)/sCR (5.9%) and 23.5% of patients achieving a VGPR. Patients who received 96 mg (n = 8; DL 6), the highest dose of the antibody evaluated on the trial, experienced the highest ORR, at 62.5%; all of these patients had a VGPR.
December 08, 2019
Results were presented today at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting from the first two dose groups (3 mg and 6 mg weekly doses).
Read the latest news and updates on this trial.
March 03, 2022
View all clinical trial locations sorted by state.
Miami, FL
Ann Arbor, MI
New Brunswick, NJ
New York, NY
Columbus, OH
We know how difficult and confusing this process can be. If you are interested in this clinical trial or have questions, you can call us at any time. You can also send us a direct message with questions.
(888) 828-2206If you are interested in keeping an eye on this trial, you can add it to your list of favorite trials. We'll send you alerts when this trial is updated.
You can explore trial locations from around the US and connect directly with a trial coordinator.
Find Nearby LocationsYou can print an overview of this trial to take in to your next appointment. Your doctor can help you understand if this trial may be right for you.
Still need help? Send us a message